Frankie Medina - ENGL 3450

 My plans for revisions are pretty self-explanatory. I want to change my convenience sampling and turn it into interviews. After the peer reviews, it opened my eyes to the wider picture of my research question. I thought surveys might be a sufficient way to collect data. However, after a thorough peer review, I am settling on doing interviews with staff, faculty, and students to compare the differences and cross-culture differences between multi-cultures. I also want to focus on how upbringings differ from a person's point-of-view when they become a fully-ranged adult. 

Research gaps I have found in my literature review are the lack of personal experience that these scholarly articles provided. A lot of the scholarly articles I used, used a lot of third-person. They lacked the personalization. Writers talked a lot about others' experiences instead of the outsiders giving their own stories. Yes, all of the scholarly articles I provided remain true and valid, but I think it would have been beneficial to give more examples of outcomes of cross-cultural technical communication. Overall, this was still one of my favorite papers to write and I am looking forward to investigating this topic further.